<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ji Ruan - Jimagine &#187; Open Society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ac.jiruan.net/category/opensociety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ac.jiruan.net</link>
	<description>Information and Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:24:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Open discussions on an open problem</title>
		<link>http://ac.jiruan.net/2010/08/open-discussions-on-an-open-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://ac.jiruan.net/2010/08/open-discussions-on-an-open-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 01:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ac.jiruan.net/?p=601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Web 2.0 tools, such as (micro)blog, wiki, we can reveal a lot of our thoughts and opinions in public, and get response from someone we have never met before. More importantly, Web 2.0 tools encourage open discussions. Here is a very good example. I saw from twitter that someone had claimed P!=NP was proved, [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Web 2.0 tools, such as (micro)blog, wiki, we can reveal a lot of our thoughts and opinions in public, and get response from someone we have never met before. More importantly, Web 2.0 tools encourage open discussions. Here is a very good example.</p>
<p>I saw from twitter that someone had claimed P!=NP was proved, which is an open problem in computer science for around 40 years (see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_versus_NP_problem">this wiki entry</a>). Many people wanted to solve it but none was successful. I reposted this message on <a href="http://twitter.com/jiruan/status/20682413193">my twitter here</a>. In a couple of days, I saw more posts about this claim, which led me to <a href="http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/">this blog</a>. The owner of the blog is Dick Lipton, a Professor of Computer Science at Georgia Tech, who have worked in the area of theory of computation since 1973. He revealed his thoughts on the proof of the claim in these blog entries: <a href="http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/08/a-proof-that-p-is-not-equal-to-np/">1</a>, <a href="http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/09/issues-in-the-proof-that-p%e2%89%a0np/">2</a>, <a href="http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/10/update-on-deolalikars-proof-that-p%e2%89%a0np/">3</a>. And in each entry, you can see more than 100 responses, including the ones from brilliant mathematicians such as Terence Tao:</p>
<p><a title="Discussions on the P!=NP proof by jiruan, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jiruan/4884113196/"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4101/4884113196_16f7a48f31.jpg" alt="Discussions on the P!=NP proof" width="500" height="226" /></a></p>
<p>Previously, such serious discussions in very hard theoretical problems may only happen in the small grounds of top talents via emails or <a href="http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/the-gdel-letter/">letters</a>, of which the general public might never learn. But I think Prof. Dick Lipton&#8217;s blog has changed this. I am very glad to see this development, and hope to see more scientists participating in open discussions of open problems like this. Overall, such effort will increase the awareness of scientific research in the general public, and even increase the speed of cracking very difficult problems.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ac.jiruan.net/2010/08/open-discussions-on-an-open-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WoW, Whitehouse 2.0!</title>
		<link>http://ac.jiruan.net/2009/05/wow-whitehouse-20/</link>
		<comments>http://ac.jiruan.net/2009/05/wow-whitehouse-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 23:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ac.jiruan.net/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The USA White House launched its strategy to reform the government in the Web 2.0 age. In this post: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/09/05/01/WhiteHouse/, it gives the information channels through which white house is reaching its citizens. These channels include: Whitehouse.gov Facebook.com/WhiteHouse MySpace.com/WhiteHouse Twitter.com/WhiteHouse Flickr.com/WhiteHouse Vimeo.com/WhiteHouse YouTube.com/WhiteHouse iTunes (videos &#38; podcasts) I would say this government is leading toward [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The USA White House launched its strategy to reform the government in the Web 2.0 age. In this post:<br />
<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/09/05/01/WhiteHouse/">http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/09/05/01/WhiteHouse/</a>, it gives the information channels through which white house is reaching its citizens. These channels include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Whitehouse.gov</li>
<li>Facebook.com/WhiteHouse</li>
<li>MySpace.com/WhiteHouse</li>
<li>Twitter.com/WhiteHouse</li>
<li>Flickr.com/WhiteHouse</li>
<li>Vimeo.com/WhiteHouse</li>
<li>YouTube.com/WhiteHouse</li>
<li>iTunes (videos &amp; podcasts)</li>
</ul>
<p>I would say this government is leading toward the right way. Well, my government, the Chinese government, is still using a communist version of web 1.0 tools. You see, my blog is still blocked from China Mainland. What a shame.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ac.jiruan.net/2009/05/wow-whitehouse-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My donations to two causes</title>
		<link>http://ac.jiruan.net/2008/12/my-donations-to-two-causes/</link>
		<comments>http://ac.jiruan.net/2008/12/my-donations-to-two-causes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ac.jiruan.net/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just made my small annual donations to some great causes that I believe in: Wikipedia ( the best knowledge base in this world ) Creative Commons ( the best supporter for an open culture in this information age ) The organisations behinds these causes are non-profitable ones, and they largely rely on volunteers&#8217; work and public donations. The [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just made my small annual donations to some great causes that I believe in:</p>
<ul>
<li>Wikipedia ( the best knowledge base in this world )</li>
<li>Creative Commons ( the best supporter for an open culture in this information age )</li>
</ul>
<p>The organisations behinds these causes are non-profitable ones, and they largely rely on volunteers&#8217; work and public donations. The fact that they do not rely on commercial entities&#8217; financial support makes them in an independent position, which is essential for  establishing the trust from public. </p>
<p>I found that this year&#8217;s targets for them are harder to be met. I guess it is largely due to the global economic crisis. Here are the current statuses, respectively: </p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Learn/en?utm_source=2008_wiki_is_there_learn_meter&amp;utm_medium=sitenotice&amp;utm_campaign=fundraiser2008">$390,9435 /Our Goal: $6 million</a></li>
<li><a href="http://support.creativecommons.org/">$ 253,063 / $500,000 by Dec 31</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Another year is over; maybe you could consider to donate an hour of your salary to such wonderful causes. Every little helps. </p>
<p>Merry Xmas!</p>
<p>Dr. Ji Ruan</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ac.jiruan.net/2008/12/my-donations-to-two-causes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science to 2.0</title>
		<link>http://ac.jiruan.net/2008/01/science-to-20/</link>
		<comments>http://ac.jiruan.net/2008/01/science-to-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.0lize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ac.jiruan.net/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read this interesting article from Scientific America: Science 2.0 Great New Tool, or Great Risk?, by M. Mitchell Waldrop. The main idea is to explore the impact of Web 2.0 tools, like wikis, blogs, on the scientific research. I was thinking about this for a while now. As you see, I started to [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read this interesting article from Scientific America: <a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=science-2-point-0-great-new-tool-or-great-risk&amp;page=1" target="_blank">Science 2.0 Great New Tool, or Great Risk?</a>, by M. Mitchell Waldrop.</p>
<p>The main idea is to explore the impact of Web 2.0 tools, like wikis, blogs,  on the scientific research.</p>
<p>I was thinking about this  for a while now. As you see, I started to do blogging 2 years ago, and I had my independent domain, jiruan.net, around half year ago. I think the openness via Internet really make the communication between me and this world much easier: people know my ideas through my web, and I get their comments from the web as well.</p>
<p><strong>That&#8217;s why I started this blog: ac.jiruan.net, to communicate with the people, like you, who want to explore this world.</strong></p>
<p>Yes, I need to put more effort to build this site up, and make it evolve along-side my research.</p>
<p>Ji<br />
20080118</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ac.jiruan.net/2008/01/science-to-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

